Skip to main content
U.S. flag
Health and Human Services Logo

An official website of the Department of Health & Human Services

menu-iconMore mobile-close-icon
mobile-back-btn-icon Back
  • menu-iconMenu
  • mobile-search-icon
AHRQ: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  • Search All AHRQ Sites
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Español
  • FAQs
  • Email Updates
MEPS Home Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
Font Size:
Contact MEPS FAQ Site Map  
S
M
L
XL
spacer
  Publication Details

Title:
   New Estimates of the Demand for Physical and Mental Health Treatment
Product type:
   Working Paper 6008
MEPS component:
   Household Component
Publication date:
   November 28, 2006
Description:
   Consumers' price responsiveness is central to current reform proposals to address rapidly escalating health care costs, but the best available estimates of price elasticities of demand are now more than 25 years old. We seek to provide more current estimates of the demand for both mental and physical health treatment using a health care demand model that incorporates the relevant costs influencing consumption decisions, including out-of-pocket payments (costsharing) for ambulatory services, out-of-pocket prescription drug costs, and insurance premiums. Following Ellis (1986) and Ellis and McGuire (1986), we use consumers' out-of-pocket payments to derive theoretically appropriate expected end-of-year prices. The demand model is estimated using the 1996-2003 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), a nationally representative survey of the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population. We address the potential endogeneity of expected end-of-year prices and health insurance coverage (or adverse selection) by estimating a correlated random effects specification (Chamberlain, 1980). This allows us to relax the untenable assumption of standard random effect models that price and health insurance are uncorrelated with unobserved individual attributes. We find that the price responsiveness of ambulatory mental health visits has decreased substantially in the last 30 years and is now slightly less elastic than visits for physical health problems. However, the demand for both mental health and non-mental prescription drugs is substantially more price elastic. We discuss the implications of our results.
Author(s):
   Chad D. Meyerhoefer and Samuel Zuvekas
Agency:
   Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Source:
   Web Only Publication
MEPS Topics:
   Doctor Visits/Use/Events and Expenditures, Emergency Room Visits/Use/Events and Expenditures, Health Care Costs/Expenditures, Medical Expenditures, Medical Providers Visits/Use/Events and Expenditures, Mental Health, Office-Based Visits/Use/Events and Expenditures, Outpatient Visits/Use/Events and Expenditures
PDF link:
   data_files/publications/workingpapers/wp_06008.pdf (425 KB)
New search
  Back to search results   Printing tips   Notes on viewing and downloading files  

MEPS HOME . CONTACT MEPS . MEPS FAQ . MEPS SITE MAP . MEPS PRIVACY POLICY . ACCESSIBILITY . COPYRIGHT
Back to topGo back to top
Back to Top Go back to top

Connect With Us

Facebook Twitter You Tube LinkedIn

Sign up for Email Updates

To sign up for updates or to access your subscriber preferences, please enter your email address below.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, MD 20857
Telephone: (301) 427-1364

  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Español
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility
  • Disclaimers
  • EEO
  • Electronic Policies
  • FOIA
  • HHS Digital Strategy
  • HHS Nondiscrimination Notice
  • Inspector General
  • Plain Writing Act
  • Privacy Policy
  • Viewers & Players
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
  • The White House
  • USA.gov